Objective Truth

It's often thought that the sciences require a more critical attitude than the 'humanities'/'arts' (including, sadly, philosophy), and the arts are thought to be subjective. (Art being subjective leads to absurd conclusions like that a Beethoven symphony is no better than the sound of banging on pots and pans randomly.)

This kinda screws up the fields, because it means people aren't even trying to get closer to the truth.

In art, we can see a big difference between the modern art movement and when people do it because the market wants good stuff.

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks

1 Comment

Good links, and good points that I hadn't considered.

I think the other problem with art is that we lost the other objective standard- that of accuracy to real life, becuase with photography, being able to create a really lifelike image ceased to be unusual.

Leave a comment

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.lulie.org/mt-tb.cgi/15

About this Post

Previous: Preemptive Attacking

Next: Forcing is Anti-Criticism

Lulie Tanett

Oxford, UK
Email: luliet@gmail.com
AIM: luliedotorg

Interests: philosophy, politics, rationality, critical rationalism, libertarianism, atheism, technology.

Influences: Karl Popper, David Deutsch, Elliot Temple, Ayn Rand.

Twitter: LulieTanett

Blogroll

- curi
- Fallible Ideas
- curi's guide to thinking
- Grasp the Nettle
- Taking Children Seriously
- Critical Rationalism